We all use stereotypes or broad assumptions to help us predict behavior in demographic categories and groups. I think we can all agree that stereotypes are, in general, bad. Yet we still do it. According to research, one effect of stereotyping is giving nonprofits a very bad name.
In the Journal of Consumer Research, in a paper titled, “Non-Profits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes
Matter,” the researchers paint a bleak picture all nonprofits should take into consideration when crafting grants, proposals, case statements and fundraising presentations. What the researchers found was that the stereotypical view is that nonprofits are “warm, generous and caring organizations.” All of those are nice attributes and understandable for nonprofits. However, the research also found that nonprofits are viewed as lacking ”the competence to produce high-quality goods or services and run financially sound businesses.” For-profits were viewed as “competent” in that area.
What this means is that in your next grant or proposal, there should be a clear plan for follow-through, reporting, fiduciary responsibility and quality controls. I’ve noted that some nonprofits are receiving ISO certification to help counter this particular stereotype.
You can’t assume people know you run the business side of your organization well. In fact, according to the research, you can assume that the there may be a “baseless misperception of incompetence.” You will need a strong presentation that includes proof-of-performance examples to change the stereotype and build credibility in the business side of your organization.












